07 Phase 7 of 9

AI-Powered Win/Loss Analysis
& Continuous Improvement

Turn every outcome into intelligence. AI extracts 12+ insights from each debrief, updates competitive profiles, and feeds learnings back into the system—automatically improving every future proposal.

94%
Debrief Capture
12
Insights/Debrief
3.2x
Learning Velocity
87%
Knowledge Reuse

Automated Debrief Analysis

AI extracts actionable intelligence from win/loss feedback

Navy AI Modernization Contract

Solicitation N0001425R0034 | Award Date: March 15, 2024

LOSS
Winner: Booz Allen Hamilton
Your Score: 84/100 | Winner Score: 91/100
Price Delta: Your bid $12.4M vs Winner $11.8M (5% higher)

12 AI-Extracted Insights

TECHNICAL

Winner's AI/ML Explainability Approach Superior

Government valued BAH's detailed LIME/SHAP integration. Our approach was too high-level. Action: Add explainability toolkit detail to future AI proposals.

PERSONNEL

Key Personnel Depth Insufficient

Winner proposed 3 PhDs in AI/ML vs our 1. Government feedback: "wanted deeper expertise." Action: Build AI/ML talent bench for future Navy pursuits.

PAST PERF

Navy-Specific Experience Weighted Heavily

Winner had 5 Navy AI projects vs our 2. Evaluator noted "similar customer experience valued." Action: Prioritize Navy AI pursuits to build relevant past performance.

PRICING

Price Sensitivity Higher Than Expected

5% price difference was significant factor. Government mentioned "budget constraints." Action: Sharpen price-to-win models for DoD contracts in current fiscal environment.

SECURITY

FedRAMP High Certification Was Differentiator

Winner's existing FedRAMP High reduced risk perception vs our "in progress" status. Action: Accelerate FedRAMP High certification timeline (target: Q3 2024).

PROPOSAL

Technical Volume Too Generic

Feedback: "approach could apply to any customer." Winner tailored heavily to Navy's unique data environment. Action: Increase customer-specific customization in technical approaches.

+ 6 more insights on teaming strategy, win themes, and competitive positioning

Air Force Cloud Migration Contract

Solicitation FA864524R0018 | Award Date: February 22, 2024

WIN
Runner-up: SAIC
Your Score: 89/100 | Runner-up Score: 82/100
Price Delta: Your bid $8.2M vs Runner-up $7.9M (4% higher but better value)

Key Success Factors

WIN THEME

"Zero-Downtime Migration" Resonated

Government cited our phased migration approach as key differentiator. Evaluator: "convinced us mission continuity was guaranteed." Action: Replicate this win theme structure for future migration RFPs.

PAST PERF

DoD Cloud Experience Highly Relevant

Our 4 DoD cloud projects scored "excellent" relevance. Government feedback: "exactly the experience we needed." Action: Feature DoD cloud portfolio prominently in future Air Force pursuits.

TEAMING

Small Business Partner Added Value

25% small business subcontract to CloudTech Solutions exceeded requirement (15%) and brought niche cybersecurity expertise. Action: Continue aggressive small business teaming on Air Force pursuits.

Continuous Learning Loop

AI feeds insights back into every phase of the process

From Debrief to Next Win

1. Capture

AI extracts insights from debrief calls, emails, and formal feedback

2. Analyze

Categorize by type, identify patterns across multiple pursuits

3. Store

Update knowledge base: competitor profiles, win themes, pricing intel

4. Apply

Automatically improve future proposals with learned best practices

Learning Applied Across Phases

Phase 1 (Discovery): Competitor win rate data updates Pwin calculations
Phase 3 (Capture): Successful win themes auto-populate new capture plans
Phase 4 (Proposal): High-scoring past performance narratives reused in similar contexts
Phase 5 (QA): Common loss factors become Red Team focus areas

Automated Competitive Intelligence

AI tracks competitor performance and updates profiles continuously

Competitor Performance Tracking (Last 12 Months)

Competitor
Observed Strengths
Win Rate Trend
Booz Allen Hamilton
Strong AI/ML expertise, deep Navy relationships, FedRAMP High certified
68% (+5%)
SAIC
Competitive pricing, broad DoD past performance, fast proposal turnaround
52% (-3%)
Leidos
Large-scale integration experience, strong technical scores, incumbent advantage
71% (+8%)
Peraton
Cybersecurity differentiation, cleared workforce, recent M&A expanding capabilities
64% (+12%)

AI updates competitor profiles after every debrief, tracking strengths, pricing strategies, and win patterns

Post-Award Learning Capabilities

Four AI systems turning outcomes into intelligence

Debrief Intelligence

AI attends debrief calls, extracts insights from feedback, and categorizes learnings by type and relevance.

Automated debrief transcription
12+ insights per debrief
Win/loss factor identification
Actionable recommendations

Pattern Recognition

AI identifies trends across multiple pursuits: what wins, what loses, and why—by customer, contract type, and competitor.

Cross-pursuit trend analysis
Customer preference mapping
Win theme effectiveness scoring
Pricing sensitivity analysis

Competitor Profiling

Continuously updated competitor intelligence: capabilities, pricing strategies, win patterns, and relationship maps.

Win/loss tracking by competitor
Capability gap analysis
Pricing strategy intelligence
Partnership & teaming patterns

Knowledge Feedback

Learnings automatically update AI models across all 7 phases, improving future Pwin, win themes, and proposals.

Auto-update Pwin models
Win theme library enrichment
Past performance optimization
3.2x faster learning velocity

Real-World Impact

How Phase 7 drives continuous improvement

Learning Velocity

Before: Learnings captured in Word docs, rarely applied to future pursuits. 6-12 month lag to incorporate feedback.

After: Insights applied to next proposal within hours. 3.2x faster learning velocity.

Knowledge Capture Rate

Before: 30-40% of debriefs captured due to manual effort, inconsistent format, lost tribal knowledge.

After: 94% of debriefs captured and analyzed by AI. 2.4x more intelligence.

Win Rate Improvement

Before: Repeating the same mistakes, stuck near industry win rates (~4%).

After: Continuous improvement loop stabilizing around a 22% win rate on supported bids. 5.5x improvement over traditional performance.

Phase 7 Value in the BD Process

How Post-Award Learning multiplies your business development effectiveness

Time Impact

Hours vs Months

Insights applied to next proposal within hours vs 6-12 month learning lag with manual processes

Quality Impact

94% Capture Rate

94% of debriefs captured and analyzed vs 30-40% manual capture rate - 2.4x more intelligence

Revenue Impact

22% Win Rate

Learning loop drives 22% win rate vs 4% industry average - 5.5x improvement from continuous improvement

Previous: Submission Management Phase 7 of 9 Return to Phase 1